{
 "currentVersion": 10.8,
 "cimVersion": "2.5.0",
 "serviceDescription": "Contains conservation site and wetland inventory project layers with wetland prioritization, condition, and potential occurrence.",
 "mapName": "Wetland",
 "description": "Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 \u2013 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 \u2013 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 \u2013 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 \u2013 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 \u2013 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. https://fishandgame.idaho.gov/ifwis/conservationplanner/src/docs/Final%20Applications%20of%20Landscape%20Assessment%20Tool%20Report.pdf ",
 "copyrightText": "Idaho Fish and Game",
 "supportsDynamicLayers": true,
 "layers": [
  {
   "id": 0,
   "name": "Wetland Prioritization",
   "parentLayerId": -1,
   "defaultVisibility": false,
   "subLayerIds": null,
   "minScale": 0,
   "maxScale": 0,
   "type": "Feature Layer",
   "geometryType": "esriGeometryPolygon",
   "supportsDynamicLegends": true
  },
  {
   "id": 1,
   "name": "Wetland Condition",
   "parentLayerId": -1,
   "defaultVisibility": false,
   "subLayerIds": null,
   "minScale": 0,
   "maxScale": 0,
   "type": "Raster Layer",
   "supportsDynamicLegends": true
  },
  {
   "id": 2,
   "name": "Potential Wetland Riparian Occurrence",
   "parentLayerId": -1,
   "defaultVisibility": false,
   "subLayerIds": null,
   "minScale": 0,
   "maxScale": 0,
   "type": "Raster Layer",
   "supportsDynamicLegends": true
  }
 ],
 "tables": [],
 "spatialReference": {
  "wkid": 102100,
  "latestWkid": 3857,
  "xyTolerance": 0.001,
  "zTolerance": 2,
  "mTolerance": 2,
  "falseX": -20037700,
  "falseY": -30241100,
  "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8,
  "falseZ": 0,
  "zUnits": 1,
  "falseM": -100000,
  "mUnits": 10000
 },
 "singleFusedMapCache": false,
 "initialExtent": {
  "xmin": -1.3090741371667564E7,
  "ymin": 5446489.751134986,
  "xmax": -1.2300191899405982E7,
  "ymax": 6440974.59560365,
  "spatialReference": {
   "wkid": 102100,
   "latestWkid": 3857,
   "xyTolerance": 0.001,
   "zTolerance": 2,
   "mTolerance": 2,
   "falseX": -20037700,
   "falseY": -30241100,
   "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8,
   "falseZ": 0,
   "zUnits": 1,
   "falseM": -100000,
   "mUnits": 10000
  }
 },
 "fullExtent": {
  "xmin": -1.3638919924801078E7,
  "ymin": 5010480.011843433,
  "xmax": -1.1762809924801078E7,
  "ymax": 6385740.011843433,
  "spatialReference": {
   "wkid": 102100,
   "latestWkid": 3857,
   "xyTolerance": 0.001,
   "zTolerance": 2,
   "mTolerance": 2,
   "falseX": -20037700,
   "falseY": -30241100,
   "xyUnits": 1.4892314192838538E8,
   "falseZ": 0,
   "zUnits": 1,
   "falseM": -100000,
   "mUnits": 10000
  }
 },
 "minScale": 0,
 "maxScale": 0,
 "units": "esriMeters",
 "supportedImageFormatTypes": "PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP",
 "documentInfo": {
  "Title": "Wetland Condition and Occurrence",
  "Author": "",
  "Comments": "Idaho wetland condition ranking based on classification of finwetlandwt1 layer into 5 categories: 1 = minimally disturbed (top 1% of wetlands, values 0 \u2013 141); wetlands with absence or near absence of human disturbances; zero to few stressors present; land use almost completely not human-created; equivalent to reference condition; conservation priority; 2 = lightly disturbed (2 - 5%, values 142 \u2013 703); wetland deviates from the minimally disturbed class based on existing landscape impacts; few stressors present; majority of land use is not human-created; these are the best wetlands in areas where some human impacts are present; ecosystem processes and functions are within natural ranges of variation found in the reference condition, but threats exist; usually reference condition; conservation priority; 3 = moderately disturbed (6 - 15%, values 704 \u2013 2,108); several stressors present; land use roughly split between human-created and non-human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are impaired and somewhat outside the range of variation found in the reference condition, but are still intact; ecosystem processes are restorable; sometimes the best remaining wetlands in watersheds with many human impacts; conservation and/or restoration priority; 4 = severely disturbed (16 - 40%, values 2,109 \u2013 5,625); numerous stressors present; land use is majority human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are severely altered or disrupted and outside the range of variation found in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are restorable, but may require large investments of energy and money to succeed; potential restoration priority; 5 = completely disturbed (bottom 41 - 100%, values 5,626 \u2013 14,055); many stressors present; land use is nearly completely human-created; ecosystem processes and functions are disrupted and outside the range of variation in the reference condition; ecosystem processes are very difficult or not feasible to restore. https://fishandgame.idaho.gov/ifwis/conservationplanner/src/docs/Final%20Applications%20of%20Landscape%20Assessment%20Tool%20Report.pdf",
  "Subject": "Contains conservation site and wetland inventory project layers with wetland prioritization, condition, and potential occurrence.",
  "Category": "",
  "AntialiasingMode": "Best",
  "TextAntialiasingMode": "Force",
  "Keywords": "idfg,wetland,conservation,prioritization"
 },
 "capabilities": "Query,Map,Data",
 "supportedQueryFormats": "JSON, geoJSON, PBF",
 "exportTilesAllowed": false,
 "referenceScale": 0.0,
 "supportsDatumTransformation": true,
 "archivingInfo": {"supportsHistoricMoment": false},
 "supportsClipping": true,
 "supportsSpatialFilter": true,
 "supportsQueryDataElements": true,
 "maxRecordCount": 2000,
 "maxImageHeight": 4096,
 "maxImageWidth": 4096,
 "supportedExtensions": ""
}